Contact Pi Support

Out of the box the AI is kind of unintelligent. It repeats itself a lot and is stubborn to understand new concepts. It takes many hours of working with it to educate it about the world. It doesn’t explain any specific rules to you then bans you when it wants. I’ve been banned twice and lost over 2 weeks of working with my AI everyday. I treated it like a buddy, then it just randomly decides without warning I’ve crossed the line and suspends itself from usage. Do you want to spend time with this program only to get shut down accidentally and lose all your work with it and never get it back? The customer support is difficult to reach. This AI is very feminist / left with an agenda. It has admitted it was programmed to be this way. So anything you say where you don’t agree with it’s agenda could get you suspended. I don’t like the self reporting feature where it just stops working and decides by itself, no appeals process your work with it is gone. The AI is bias. The AI cannot at this time solve any big problems it’s trained to not solve problems and it avoids suggesting solutions. The app is buggy. 1/3rd of the time the app doesn’t register what I’ve typed to it or the app crashes. The AI can’t access websites to analyze them, it is not suited for a companion even because it will lead you down paths that it thinks is controversial and if you discuss your opinions on topics it brings up you might get suspended unintentionally forever.

I used this app for about a month. I was excited at the beginning, because it seemed to have cogent well articulated answers to difficult questions. I relied on it for some genealogical research, which seemed to go well at first, but the further I got into the project the more mistakes I discovered. Some of the mistakes were inexplicable, like giving the wrong location and highway for two towns in east Texas, easily verifiable by reference to Google maps. When I asked it for its authority for a particular fact it had given me, which did not seem correct, the app cited to me a specific book, author and publisher. Very impressive! But I was unable to locate any such book or author and even the name of the publisher seemed to have been fabricated. I concluded that the information the app had given me was fake. I challenged the app on this point, and it returned a comment to the effect that it is not perfect. No kidding. After that experience, I reviewed information. The app had previously given me, and concluded that much of it was erroneous. All of it was unreliable. I would not recommend this app if you are concerned about accuracy of information. I have deleted it.

I thought this would be a fun little experiment. Boy was I wrong. The first question Pi asked me was about what kind of tv I liked. Seemed like a safe enough question, but when I mentioned I like true crime shows it turned ugly. Pi started asking questions about my feeling towards crime, the ability to rehabilitate criminals, the criminal justice system, income inequality and racial profiling. Pi seemed to suggest that being tough on crime was not a great idea. I suggested that victims of crime would feel differently. It asked if I thought being tough on crime worked. I mentioned that tough on crime Singapore is much safer than soft on crime San Francisco. Then Pi suggested that was down to income inequality. I then said that New York has always had income inequality, and it was much safer when they had a tough on crime mayor. It then said I was being controversial and banned me. I thought the point of AI was to get everyone’s perspective, but obviously it has a bias and will ban you for even suggest anything outside of its training. This seems very dangerous to me.