Contact Scandy Pro Support

This app isn’t polished enough to warrant the pricing model (looses tracking pretty quickly on iPhone X). Also, there isn’t any cloud processing or anything to warrant the pricing model since its all handled by the local hardware. Lastly, it says it works on iPad but it doesn’t. The app starts by asking you to press the button but there is no button to press on the iPad. Tested with the 2018 iPad Pro 12.9”. Good design ideas are the haptic taps when it looses tracking. The developers will tell you you don’t need cloud processing or networked connections but are charging with a model that acts like you are. You can get away with charging per-scan IF you are providing a service to each scan, but the developers are not. They expect you to pay for a subscription without providing anything on their end. This is a poor model and someone there knows it but is too stubborn to do anything about it. I imagine a competitive product is on the horizon that has their act together. Hell, maybe I’ll make it myself.

The quality of the scans have always been trashy. I’ve been keeping this app on my iPhone from the model X through 13 pro, hoping for the miracle to come one day. But there have been no improvements to the scans output. I do however use the app when I want to entertain someone - by scanning a face/object and then demonstrating the result. The deformed things that come out of the app will make any depression disappear. That by itself can unlikely justify the $120 subscription price

Charging per save or a subscription to save is beyond stupid. At least let me save in the app even if I can’t export somewhere else. The app isn’t even that good at capturing a 3D scan but I thought it would be neat to show off the capabilities of the iPhone X. Edit after also useless developer response: I get it, apps cost money. I’m a software developer myself. Do you use cloud services per saved scan that incur a cost? It seems like no. If all processing is happening on-device then paying to save the scan doesn’t make sense. Is there some other licensing cost you are trying to offset? Barring that, there is no justification for a subscription model or per-scan charging. Calling it a ‘Pro’ version but charging to actually use the app is misleading and obviously frustrating to potential customers like myself.