Contact Lux Light Meter Pro Support

First, I just wanted to test a light. So I tested the beam on my wall. And it gave me a reading. 20. So then I tested a dark spot like my pocket. He gave me a reading zero. So I tested the same spot again and it gave me 20 again. I was amazed I thought this was good. I could repeat this over and over again. I thought wow what a wonderful app. Next, I decided to switch to the rear facing camera is it in the front, this is where the problems begin. Because I cannot actuate the camera while hold the phone flat against the wall. That was frustrating. So I switch back to the front camera. The reading that I just got for 20 is now too. That’s a huge difference. So I repeated that test over and over again and got the same result wild fluctuations.

Got this a few days ago and it seemed to work fairly decent. Using it to compare lighting in different areas. Went ahead and paid for the pro version. Next day it will not work. Does absolutely nothing. Checked it off and on for the past couple of days and it still does nothing or at best gives some ludicrous reading then freezes up. Went to the feedback area in the app where it says u can contact them several times. Getting a message ‘trying to connect thank you for your patience’. Never connects. I guess I’m not THAT patient. Deleting this trashy worthless app from my iPhone X. I’ll never pay for the upgrade again until I use it several days with success.

Open your camera and point it at something. assign a numeric value to the light level pointed directly at the sensor. you just created a lux meter that you can sell in the App Store..... this is a completely inaccurate way to measure light levels in a room. The main problem is that the sensor only detects light pointing directly at its field of view. Lux is a measure of light over a surface of one square meter. A real Light Meter measures light indirectly, that’s why they have that white globe around the sensor. The bottom line is that I tested this app beside a real light meter, and the results were wildly inaccurate. If you’re just looking for a toy to play with, then go ahead and pay the developer $3.