ElseviereBooksonVitalSource is ok. But some of the editing and writing on content review questions could really be improved (at least in the pre-nursing and. nursing disciplines).
A key problem is a lack of crowdsourcing for solutions. What I mean is there is also no easy way for a user or instructor to easily flag errors in content, or writing (especially in questions and rationales). It take multiple emails, go through multiple levels of customer service representatives, where they want screenshots of their incorrect data and screen shots or references the correct data.
And then, after all of that, they will eventually send a note to the content team where it can be flagged so it might possibly be corrected for a later revision.
They could simply have a button or an email to send content questions and concerns to and faculty and students would likely report errors. The could be quickly assessed to see if they are applicable and the information flagged for editions by a revision author.
Considering the cost of Elsevier’s resources is roughly a thousand dollars a semester, these resources should be AMAZING, but honestly it feels like their approach to education is antiquated and clumsy. It feels like bloated bureaucracy.
The customer service is pretty good but beyond the people who answer the phones and emails, I am completely underwhelmed.