When one user writes a new headline or summary, it just replaces the previous one with no indication that it was replaced or any indication of the edit history. This is worse than Wikipedia, where at least we could see edit history.
I have encountered strong conservative bias in the moderation process. I have had my summaries rejected for being “biased” when all I am doing is quoting senators on what they actually said. I don’t think that the mods actually read the sources, they are just like any average person, they judge with their gut, not their intellect. Where can we see any information around who rejected a title/summary and why? I am also seeing summaries approved which are clearly biased towards the right, which are not grounded in the facts of the stories at all.
Newsvoice ’s design incentivizes sensationalized summaries: users submit exaggerated clickbait titles, moderators do not fact-check and so it gets approved, lots of people vote because they are outraged. Ultimately title may get edited to be correct, but a persistent user can continue to edit the title/summary to be misleading. And mods are approving this inaccurate stuff.
Also, if I cancel a draft comment it is deleted. This is frustrating if I cancel by accident and lose my work.