Contact Designer City Support

by Pumblino

This company allows their own facebook group to degrade their own customers. Post a question and they remove your comments and questions. If the remarks aren’t well enough to boost the ego of the group’s administrators, they dismiss you without explanation. To make money, you must allow your customers to find answers that are not supplied in the minimal game guide. So, the game itself is ok for what it is. No waiting for buildings to mature, so once its placed it is operational but needs constant upgrades to get maximum population and effectiveness. Gets extremely redundant. Some nice buildings, some silly looking. All in all, not very realistic but not too cartoonish, so in the middle is where it lays. Searching for an item to place is a challenge. The mechanics could be made easier to navigate.
Deleted app after all this nonsense. We come to a game for fun, excitement and sometimes even some interaction with others, not company supported customer abuse

by Opticscumperjumper

This game has massive potential to be amazing. However, if you look at the greatest city building games out there, you have the whole map immediately available. I find the purchasing of land to be a problem. It breaks up the flow of the game and repeatedly leaves me having to move my city around. Or it becomes difficult to develop a good plan around it. It’s also terrible that the expansion is 1 block outward around the map. To feel the effect of the expansion you have to completely remap your city. Finally, I feel the buildings being locked is a problem. Rather than locking buildings there should be population or monetary requirements but regardless leave them open to use. Finally, the increasing cost of placing the same building seems like a money making scam for the devs. It breaks up the aesthetics of a neighborhood or city block. This game had so much potential but there are things that feel like you’re forced to spend real money to develop your city and restrictions that make the city building clunky

by Jovialcity

These games are ok but have built in limitations. The programmers only wanted to make 2 sides for every building rather than 4 sides to make it 3d. So you can’t rotate and position buildings the way you’d like which is annoying. Plus you can’t rotate the city. To make it function with half built buildings, they had to make it so you can’t rotate the city. That really limits your views, especially with skyscrapers. It makes the game much less fun. They should make the buildings complete and allow city rotation. The other big flaw is poor zoom level. You can’t zoom out and see even half your city at once. I don’t know why they would intentionally build in these visual limitations on a completely visual game. I can understand problems that would be hard to solve, like mismatched scale. But intentionally cutting the visuals by 50% and by 50% and by 50% isn’t really providing a good user experience.