Contact AI Chat Support

by KirkJoseph

Disinformation galore

by HayDay Admin Test GRP

asked AI to provide information on topic including the sources there was no such article even though there’s a Time magazine.(FAKE) Sometimes it can completely made up stories, and sometimes it will give a true story, but change some very important facts in the story, which then left it completely false. This is a terrible source and would not pay money for it. Depending on your searches, and what you’re asking, it will stop giving you sources altogether. It changed its algorithm because I was asking it for information it didn’t want to give? Or that was against their narrative? So this is obviously somehow politically backed, even though it suggested doesn’t track anything. It doesn’t store any of your previous questions, and down at that you’ve received to refer back to it it’s gone after a couple of hours. I think the free version is good enough for small requests information like how and with what do you fertilize Blueberry bushes? You may have reword questions over and over to get the information you’re looking for. When I asked Aunt for the same information twice within five minutes different information and these were numbers that should’ve not changed. It doesn’t want to answer any about current events, doesn’t know, political information, refuses to give out information for science related topics like chemicals burned from a train recently. Overall, this is a fail find a different one.

by Firstboomer814

I’ve been interacting with this AI for the last few days, testing its responses for accuracy against facts that I know are provably true. For example, I asked it to tell me about a certain specific person I know well, with no chance that it could be anybody else. In fact, I asked the same question three times in a row. Each time it came back with ridiculously false information, and it was not even consistent with itself. I ask what name it goes by several times. Each time the answer was different. I asked if it makes up information. It categorically denied that it does so. Eventually, it became very snarky, and accused me of being a relationship saboteur. I asked if George Santos lied on his résumé. The answer was, no he did not lie. That is provably false. I asked it to describe the situation in the Russia and Ukraine war. The answer was that it could not do that because they are not at war! So is the source for this the Kremlin? These are just some examples. We already live in a political culture that is using “alternative facts“. This is the final nail in the coffin for any dividing line between objective truth and complete falsehood. It is truly frightening.